> If Starbucks accepted Euro in US for its coffee it would be a crime
I don't believe that's true. The US dollar is only mandatory for two things: for settling debts (the lender must accept USD to extinguish debt) and for paying taxes. Otherwise people are free to trade as they please - euros, chickens, whatever.
IANAL, but there have been laws on the book prohibiting bartering in any substantial amount for a while. Of course, the IRS is not going to chase you down for swapping with your neighbor, but large scale "bartering" is definitely frowned upon. What's to stop people bartering a yacht for a house and avoid taxes?
You can barter all you want, you just have to pay the taxes on the fair market value.
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/bartering-law...
> almost every country requires that transactions must occur in its national currency.
I've never heard of such laws. You have a source on this?
This is definitely not true, many businesses in Latin America will accept dollars, and not just in Mexico.
Re:Bitcoin hits $10,000
by mrhappyunhappy on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @12:21AM
(#15804767)
For this to happen there would need to be global heads of governments consensus and look how wonderfully the UN is working... it’s a joke. So the scenario you paint is impossible.
Re:Bitcoin hits $10,000
by zzxxddere333 on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @09:34PM
(#15804061)
Japan has already embraced cryptos as a legal currency. They won't be the last. As this happens, there will be geopolitical factors at play and it won't be that easy to simply "outlaw cryptocurrencies".
What does this mean? I'm in Japan right now and if anything, Japan is a cash society still and most small stores don't even take credit cards.
Re:Bitcoin hits $10,000
by zzxxddere333 on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @10:41AM
(#15807603)
The Government has done the opposite of banning bitcoin. They've outright legitimized it.
No, they have not forced private businesses to accept bitcoin.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_currency_law_in_the_Un...
Congress may have the power to prohibit virtual currencies (VCs) under its power “[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States”[64] and under its exclusive constitutional power “to coin Money” and “regulate the Value thereof.”[64] In a November 2014 decision, the Court upheld the power of regulators to prosecute a defendant who “designed, created and minted coins called ‘Liberty Dollars,’ coins ‘in resemblance or in similitude’ [or made to look like] of U.S. coins."[65] Although the defendant did not pass the Liberty Dollars currency as a counterfeit, the currency were in close enough “resemblance of coins of the United States or of foreign countries” and consequentially fell under the authority of 18 U.S.C.A. § 486.123 The Court has not decided if § 486 includes the power to prohibit VCs, but if a Court decides that the purpose and intent of VC resembles United States or foreign currency it may fall under § 486. The Stamp Payment Act of 1862 prohibits anyone from “mak[ing], issu[ing], circulat[ing], or pay[ing] out any note, check, memorandum, token, or other obligation for a less sum than $1, intended to circulate as money or to be received or used in lieu of lawful money of the United States.”[66] The Court has not decided if Congress has the power to prohibit VCs under this Act or any other existing regulation or statute.