Re:Pai: Twitter Is Bigger Threat to Open Net Than ISPs
by H99189 on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @04:56PM
(#15802224)
I whole-heartedly agree that ISP's shouldn't be outright blocking anything. I'm Pro-Net Neutrality Net-whatever to keep the pipes open and unfettered by greedy corporations.
I'm just pointing out the sheer hypocrisy of the recent campaigns talking about censorship as a possibility when the right has been getting attacked/censored by every big SV company in recent years. Now they're crying about possibility when they're engaged in the very act themselves. I guess they're right, they would know, so yeah i'm pro-NN.
Re:Pai: Twitter Is Bigger Threat to Open Net Than ISPs
by s73ver_ on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @07:06PM
(#15803275)
I disagree. If I unleash a horde of spambots on this site, posting spam, and they get removed, am I being censored? If I constantly use slurs and other insults at other users, and I get my account banned because of it, am I being censored?
Re:Pai: Twitter Is Bigger Threat to Open Net Than ISPs
by dragonwriter on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @07:08PM
(#15803290)
Yes, in both cases.
Censorship is a problem in certain cases (government, especially viewpoint-based censorship, for instance), but not in all cases.
If you believe that what Reddit and Twitter are doing is wrong, then why on earth would a reasonable solution be to extend the ability to do more of that to actors that one cannot reasonably avoid? I have a grand total of 1 ISP to choose from. The vast, vast majority of Americans have 1 or 2 to choose from. If NN is revoked, and Cox (my ISP) decides they're going to act like Twitter, then I have exactly no recourse. Why do you believe that is the way to go?