News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator by JumpCrisscross on Monday November 27, 2017 @04:03PM (#15791354)
I agree there should be a competency exemption to the SEC's "accredited investor" requirement [1]. FINRA already loves administering exams [2].

That said, contrast the S&L crisis [3] with Bernie Madoff's fraud [4]. The former lost $160 billion of regular Joes' money (along with wealthy investors'). $132 billion of taxpayer money had to be spent, alongside countless hours of regulators', judges' and lawmakers' time, again, on the public dime. A minor political crisis started (and subsided).

With the latter, $70 billion was lost (though it might have been as "small" as $20 billion). Prosecutors and judges still got involved, but fines repaid their efforts. Systemic effects were largely contained.

TL; DR We restrict the masses from illiquid investments procured through irregular channels because (1) the legal costs of diligence preclude small investments, meaning small investors either invest at a material disadvantage or invest too much (relative to their worth) and (2) the lower your worth, the higher the probability that a busted investment will lose you your shirt. That turns a financial problem into a de-stabilising political problem.

Side note: early-stage investing isn't as profitable, on a risk-adjusted basis, as it might seem if one only counts the winners.

[1] https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answers-accredhtm.html

[2] http://www.finra.org/industry/qualification-exams

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savings_and_loan_crisis

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Madoff#Size_of_loss_to...

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is not legal, nor any other kind, of advice. Consult an investment adviser and a securities lawyer before making risky investments.

Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator by xadhominemx on Monday November 27, 2017 @04:12PM (#15791448)
There are competency exemptions. For example, "knowledgeable employees" of private investment firms are allowed to participate in PE deals even if they are not accredited investors.
Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator by JumpCrisscross on Monday November 27, 2017 @04:18PM (#15791502)
> "knowledgeable employees" of private investment firms are allowed to participate in PE deals even if they are not accredited investors.

These people almost always earn more than $200,000 a year and so qualify as "accredited investors" under the SEC's definition. Keep in mind, too, that start-ups can compensate their unaccredited employees with equity just the same.

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is not legal nor securities advice.

Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator by xadhominemx on Monday November 27, 2017 @04:30PM (#15791622)
>These people almost always earn more than $200,000 a year and so qualify as "accredited investors" under the SEC's definition

Actually not, because accredited investors must have cleared $200k for the two previous calendar years and most people who co-invest under the knowledgeable employees exemption are PE associates who have been on the job for less than two years.

Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator by JumpCrisscross on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:30PM (#15792225)
> most people who co-invest under the knowledgeable employees exemption are PE associates who have been on the job for less than two years

Source? (Private equity associates are entry-level number crunchers. Their fraction of carry is a rounding error, if positive.)

Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator by xadhominemx on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:32PM (#15792248)
I don't have a source, but most capital deployed by private investment firms (ie, the firms where the exemption is relevant) is deployed by traditional PE shops. And in my direct experience, the employees at traditional PE shops who invest via the exemption are almost always associates. And also in my direct experience, the vast majority of PE associates are on the job for two years, three max.

Private equity associates very rarely receive carry, which is why they co-invest instead.

*edited for clarity

Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator by JumpCrisscross on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:37PM (#15792283)
> Private equity associates very rarely don't get carry, which is why they co-invest instead

The vast majority of partner co-investment vehicles I've come across contain partners' capital. A rounding error may be from associates, who are usually counted against the limited number of unaccredited investors such funds can, with great legal liability, be marketed to.