Re:Physicists make most precise measurement ever of the prot...
by effie on Sunday November 26, 2017 @04:21PM
(#15783059)
Is it really necessary to invert those matrices? Often that is possible, but not the best way to find the solution of the problem:
https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/01/19/dont-invert-that-m...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Physicists make most precise measurement ever of the prot...
by msds on Sunday November 26, 2017 @04:38PM
(#15783145)
Presumably, an ensemble of nuclear theorists, particularly those dedicating their lives to making big LQCD calculations, would avoid inverting large ill-conditioned matrices, if that was a clever thing to do.
I know a few QFT types - they tend to be decently intelligent and mathematically capable. Ok, they're more like wickedly smart...
Re:Physicists make most precise measurement ever of the prot...
by evanb on Sunday November 26, 2017 @04:44PM
(#15783189)
It depends on the computational step. Often we "just" need to compute the determinant, in which case we use a trick. In some other cases, we do only need linear solves. Exact inversion of the whole thing is often prohibitive.