News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Physicists make most precise measurement ever of the prot... by effie on Sunday November 26, 2017 @04:21PM (#15783059)
Is it really necessary to invert those matrices? Often that is possible, but not the best way to find the solution of the problem: https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/01/19/dont-invert-that-m...
Re:Physicists make most precise measurement ever of the prot... by msds on Sunday November 26, 2017 @04:38PM (#15783145)
Presumably, an ensemble of nuclear theorists, particularly those dedicating their lives to making big LQCD calculations, would avoid inverting large ill-conditioned matrices, if that was a clever thing to do.

I know a few QFT types - they tend to be decently intelligent and mathematically capable. Ok, they're more like wickedly smart...

Re:Physicists make most precise measurement ever of the prot... by evanb on Sunday November 26, 2017 @04:44PM (#15783189)
It depends on the computational step. Often we "just" need to compute the determinant, in which case we use a trick. In some other cases, we do only need linear solves. Exact inversion of the whole thing is often prohibitive.