Re:A CMS with no server and 18 lines of configuration
by detaro on Sunday November 26, 2017 @03:22PM
(#15782781)
> The basic idea is that's its an editor friendly content management UI for persisted data stored in a GitHub repository.
Since it was discussed in a different subthread: If you would describe it like that, why isn't something straightforward like that the blog post title?
Since it was discussed in a different subthread: If you would describe it like that, why isn't something straightforward like that the blog post title?