Re:A CMS with no server and 18 lines of configuration
by detaro on Sunday November 26, 2017 @11:54AM
(#15781722)
> because folks are having a hard time understanding the benefit compared to a large solution like WordPress, as evidenced in this thread.
So apparently the title failed to communicate this correctly. (IMHO, you should present it as a editing frontend or a backend UI or ... that's used in combination with other tools and services to form a CMS)
So apparently the title failed to communicate this correctly. (IMHO, you should present it as a editing frontend or a backend UI or ... that's used in combination with other tools and services to form a CMS)