Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by jalopy on Saturday November 25, 2017 @02:51PM
(#15777622)
I tried Quantum and it crushed the battery of my MacBook Air. Activity Monitor showed much more energy usage than chrome. Anyone experience the same?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by frik on Saturday November 25, 2017 @02:54PM
(#15777641)
There seem to be a bug with MP4 video processing it eats CPU and battery like crazy (for me both on macOS and Win7), but otherwise, the new FF is great.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by rene_bg on Saturday November 25, 2017 @02:58PM
(#15777666)
You can use [1] to force YouTube videos being streamed as H.264 instead of VP8/9. This helps with the battery issue (at least on YouTube).
[1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/h264ify/
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by vim_wannabe on Saturday November 25, 2017 @03:04PM
(#15777699)
I think browser makers (or whoever it needs to be) should offer an option to save battery over a little bit of extra bandwidth. Maybe even make it the default.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by the8472 on Saturday November 25, 2017 @03:56PM
(#15777932)
youtube's logic selects the codec, not the browser
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by pests on Saturday November 25, 2017 @07:12PM
(#15778719)
Not if the browser only advertises support for the one it wants YouTube to pick.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by ComputerGuru on Saturday November 25, 2017 @05:12PM
(#15778281)
No, it’s a negotiation wherein the client submits its list of supported protocols and the server chooses between them.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by icebraining on Saturday November 25, 2017 @06:49PM
(#15778634)
And since FF supports both, it's YouTube which is choosing the codec, as the8472 wrote.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by pests on Saturday November 25, 2017 @07:08PM
(#15778703)
And what vim_coder and ConputerGuru meant was that Firefox would present a spoofed list of supported codecs to YouTube to force selection of the higher bandwidth, lower-powered codec.
Just because Firefox technically supports a format doesn't mean it has to disclose that format to external servers for selection.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by icebraining on Saturday November 25, 2017 @08:09PM
(#15778918)
Having custom behaviors for specific sites is a terrible practice. Browsers are complex enough as they are without an extra layer of hacks.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by ComputerGuru on Saturday November 25, 2017 @10:00PM
(#15779229)
Who said anything about custom behavior for custom sites? A simple “on battery? X264/265 only” is what’s being discussed here.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by the8472 on Saturday November 25, 2017 @11:36PM
(#15779431)
That does not work because the browser that does not know how much it can reduce the presented feature-set without actually breaking the site. Some content is vpx-only.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by username223 on Saturday November 25, 2017 @11:19PM
(#15779402)
It seems just about the same as having custom behaviors for specific user agents. Sadly, that's how things work these days.
Re:Ciao, Chrome: Firefox Quantum Is the Browser Built for 2017
by frik on Saturday November 25, 2017 @03:09PM
(#15777722)
Good to know, but at least for me actually occurs with MP4 files. I tried it on my own video MP4/H.264 files - loading the video with the video tag with plain HTML5. I am sure the FF devs know about the FF57 video bug and have fixed it already in nightly build or are working on it.