News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Learning to Think and Argue: a path to automated theorem ... by c-cube on Sunday November 26, 2017 @05:30AM (#15780277)
So, not even referencing the decades of research in the field of ATP? :/
Re:Learning to Think and Argue: a path to automated theorem ... by aidanrocke on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @05:53AM (#15805954)
I appreciate your feedback.

The paper I referenced by Josef Urban et al. is representative of the state-of-the-art. That said, this is a first draft and I will make a lot of changes. Adding more references on ATP being one of them.

If you have any other thoughts/comments, I'd be very interested in hearing them.

Re:Learning to Think and Argue: a path to automated theorem ... by stevekintor on Friday November 24, 2017 @10:56PM (#15774363)
An underrated field these days
Re:Learning to Think and Argue: a path to automated theorem ... by aidanrocke on Saturday November 25, 2017 @01:11PM (#15777060)
That's a very good point. I also think there's a difference between Automated Theorem Proving and AGI since entities with high-functioning general intelligence(i.e. AGI) aren't necessarily good at mathematics. ATP is a specific form of AGI in my opinion.