Re:Faecal transplant effectively treats recurrent or unrespo...
by IanCal on Friday November 24, 2017 @10:45AM
(#15771416)
Also the result you care about is often not "does it work?" but "does it work better than the current approach?".
Re:Faecal transplant effectively treats recurrent or unrespo...
by TheAdamAndChe on Friday November 24, 2017 @10:36AM
(#15771369)
Yup. It's like wanting placebo controlled trials for cancer. It would be unethical and ungodly harmful to condemn people to suffering and death just so people could gather data that wouldn't even compare the results to the current best practices.
Re:Faecal transplant effectively treats recurrent or unrespo...
by cpncrunch on Friday November 24, 2017 @11:51AM
(#15771736)
>Are you familiar with c diff? Placebo's don't work
More familiar than you apparently, because placebos have been proven to work:
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/853175
I think the problem is the subjective measure, so it's impossible to know which symptoms are caused by c.diff and which from IBS.
In general, placebo controlled trials are usually conducted for diseases which don't have an effective standard of care, or for conditions which aren't serious enough to be considered life threatening. For more serious diseases where a standard of care exists (standard of care is usually scientifically discovered but validated by placebo controlled trials), you conduct trials and compare the performance of the new drug/therapy with the existing standard of care as the control group.