Re:Due to Bitcoin network fees, customer loses $10 trying to...
by makomk on Friday November 24, 2017 @04:04AM
(#15770198)
You're assuming that you're content to always be one block behind on average, that the node never goes down and has to catch up, and that the block size never increases. The block size is already increasing, and you're suggesting an even bigger increase. Also, cheap VPSes are often pretty terrible in the IOPS department because storage is shared, worse than a normal non-SSD setup.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Due to Bitcoin network fees, customer loses $10 trying to...
by mrb on Friday November 24, 2017 @02:55PM
(#15772689)
The node is never one block behind. Block verification is instantaneous on my VPS. You seem to be under the false impression that when a block is announced, a node has to suddenly verify 2-3k txns in a brief moment. This is not how things work. Txns are verified incrementally as they are added one at a time to the mempool.