News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ... by timdev2 on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @11:39PM (#15762788)
I'm not entirely clear on why this isn't a story about an insurance company suing the city. The author mentions that the city offered $5k to cover Lech's deductible, which implies the property was insured. Do homeowner's policies typically not cover this kind of scenario?
Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ... by dailyvijeos on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @11:56PM (#15762861)
It depends. DP- are for rentals which often includes loss of rental income, HO- are for homeowners. Almost all US policies exclude flooding, which is a special insurance. There’s also umbrella insurance for special situations beyond personal or homeowners insurance.

For anything broken that can’t be fixed or replaced to the original value, he should seek a diminished value claim.

Comparision matrix of coverage amongst standard plans:

http://www.andersonmurison.com/personal/coverage%20compariso...

IANALOIA

Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ... by gonational on Thursday November 23, 2017 @10:06AM (#15765457)
It’s not up to the homeowner to use his insurance to repair his house when the city did the damage.
Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ... by timdev2 on Thursday November 23, 2017 @01:35PM (#15766961)
I'm not sure why not. Seems like exactly the sort of unlikely event that I'd want my insurance to cover. Isn't the whole point of insurance that they make me whole, and use their ample legal department to pursue the responsible parties to recover those costs (if such parties exist, in this case the city)?
Re:50 SWAT officers bombard, destroy bystander’s house with ... by gonational on Saturday November 25, 2017 @12:53AM (#15774634)
Your insurance is there only to protect you, not to protect others that cause damages to you.