Re:Google collects cell tower info even if location services...
by djrogers on Tuesday November 21, 2017 @10:15PM
(#15753941)
> Apple had a fairly similar headline in 2011[1]. Now watch people here on HN explain why that was completely different. It's a guarantee.
Ok, since you’ve so eloquently asked - a local copy of your location history that colllected when location services are turned on is completely different from remotely collecting location data even when you’ve explicitly disabled location services.
Any attempt to say these are the same thing has gone beyond naive to willfully ignorant at best.
IMO both Google and Apple aren't saints. Apple had a fairly similar headline in 2011[1]. Now watch people here on HN explain why that was completely different. It's a guarantee.
We really should be focusing coming up with ideas on what we can do. My friend for example (and this isn't a perfect solution) but he bought 2 phones, one of these for calling:
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41AwGb3pKCL...
(extremely thin in real life)
And then he caries a smartphone for encrypted chat apps etc. He removed a bunch of hardware chips from the smartphone so even if you put a simcard it it doesn't connect anywhere. Also the microphone was removed and some other things. It works great. At first he had it with the simcard still in, but he wanted more privacy. Personally, I would have kept a 4g only simcard or something, it's kind of a trade-off because now he can only chat on wifi.
It's far from perfect, but at least he's trying something.
[1]https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/apr/20/iphone-tr...