An "auto" will have less incidence of wrecks and drive provably safer. And the "auto" will also record everything as proof, so if there is a wreck involved, it's a simple "download and review the footage". Guilt is now easy to prove as well as trivial to exonerate.
And all of those things will bring the cost of insurance down for the insurance companies. And many of them will then lower their rates appropriately given very high standard of proof they provide.
After all, insurance is heavily based in the sciences and mathematics. If they weren't, insurance companies wouldn't last very long at all.
Now, I have no clue on how to get politicians to understand science. I'm not sure if that's even possible, as science can easily go against an ideology - and thusly their political stance.
To be honest, once autonomous driving systems become so good they are provably and reliably better than humans, insurance companies will probably charge a premium for the privilege of driving your car yourself.
I am just not sure when autopilots will become that good. OTOH, I did not expect to see self-driving cars arrive during my lifetime, and now it looks very strongly like I will. ;-)
> Now, I have no clue on how to get politicians to understand science.
Given the kind of political influence car manufactures have (at least here in Germany), I think that will not be too much of a problem once the demand is there.
In the long term, yes, definitely. And I am looking forward to the day.
But it is going to be a while, and it is going to be a while longer until all the politicians and insurance companies are convinced of that, too.