News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kotlin: A Language with a Bright Future by lmm on Monday November 20, 2017 @10:20AM (#15740465)
To have a clean/nice/familiar syntax in a language with a semi-decent type system is actually a pretty big deal. What're the other options? Java and C# are pretty cumbersome, Haskell and OCaml (and to a certain extent F# and Rust) look weird, Swift/C#/F# are to a certain extent tied to proprietary platforms, and while Scala actually has a nice core syntax the culture of its libraries tended to hide that away under a pile of sigils.
Re:Kotlin: A Language with a Bright Future by pron on Monday November 20, 2017 @10:31AM (#15740558)
What feels cumbersome to some may not feel cumbersome to others, or they may not care as much about this, because, for example, they can feel that concrete code is less important than design, and considering that a minor reduction (at best) in the time spent working with code translates to negligible (or even negative) overall contribution to the project, and may certainly not justify sacrificing the many other conveniences that come with using a hugely popular, familiar and well-tooled language.
Re:Kotlin: A Language with a Bright Future by kumarvvr on Monday November 20, 2017 @10:57AM (#15740790)
I can't really pinpoint it, but somehow C# dosen't seem so cumbersome as Java. Perhaps it's the libraries.
Re:Kotlin: A Language with a Bright Future by wvenable on Monday November 20, 2017 @01:04PM (#15741790)
C# isn't as cumbersome as Java.