The Shortest Papers Ever Published (2016)

Re:The Shortest Papers Ever Published (2016) by jerf on Monday November 20, 2017 @08:31AM (#15739737)

In my opinion, it is clear the author simply copied that video, because not only is it the exact same set of papers, if memory serves (as I watched it only last week), it is in the exact same order, which is particularly determinative. Citation would be appropriate at the very least.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Shortest Papers Ever Published (2016) by fastball on Monday November 20, 2017 @09:01AM (#15739887)

A citation would absolutely be appropriate. However, you have it the wrong way around.

This blog post was published Jun 17, 2016.

The Numberphile video was published Dec 7, 2016.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Shortest Papers Ever Published (2016) by jerf on Monday November 20, 2017 @10:13AM (#15740411)

I stand corrected then. And disappointed... I like the Numberphile videos.

[ Parent | on HN ]