Re:Deleting $300M by messing around with Ethereum contracts
by dandare on Monday November 20, 2017 @05:35AM
(#15739007)
Laic here: Could we not keep Solidity Turing complete as it is and just build a restricted framework on top that will be audited and not Turing complete and just encourage regular programmers to use the framework and its predefined audited functions instead for day to day contracts? Occasionally new tools could be developed in Solidity that will be carefully audited and aded as safe to the regulated framework.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Deleting $300M by messing around with Ethereum contracts
by repomies6999 on Monday November 20, 2017 @05:48AM
(#15739061)
How about not having turing complete language where it doesn't make sense?