News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Chatlogs, Celebrated Hacker and Activist Confesses Cou... by falcolas on Sunday November 19, 2017 @04:38PM (#15736087)
So, if someone comes along, who has been seen entering a closed room alone with you, and claims to have been raped repeatedly by you - should we stop associating with you? If a previously consensual encounter is later claimed to be non-consensual, should we ensure that you never get a job again in the tech industry?

Perhaps "convicted in court" is a too high of bar to you, but given the fact that people do lie about being sexually assaulted, perhaps the bar of "being accused means you did it" is a bit too low.

Ultimately it's up to each individual to decide the proper position of their bar, and perhaps this guy did indeed do it (personally, I don't care)... but the current trend of taking the accusers word as an actionable truth is troubling.

Re:In Chatlogs, Celebrated Hacker and Activist Confesses Cou... by runesoerensen on Sunday November 19, 2017 @04:55PM (#15736170)
> perhaps this guy did indeed do it (personally, I don't care)

You might want to elaborate on this - it sounds like you don't care even if you think someone is a rapist, but I hope that's not your position? That's a really low bar.

Re:In Chatlogs, Celebrated Hacker and Activist Confesses Cou... by erikpukinskis on Sunday November 19, 2017 @06:29PM (#15736563)
Acting on information is not the same as believing it. You can act on something while still maintaining the possibility the information is wrong. Even a 51% probability can be acted on to good effect sometimes.