As I pointed out in my original comment, Bing also uses an AMP cache and sends users to AMP pages from the Bing app, which is why saying that anything different about them is ironic makes little sense.
OK, but it hacks the scrolling in the same way amp pages do. So I assumed it was amp.
> promote AMP pages, as you claim.
100% it promotes amp pages.
> Bing also uses an AMP cache and sends users to AMP pages from the Bing app
I am not talking about bing "app". I don't know if such a thing exists. I am talking about www.bing.com/news. Click that link and bask in the glory of blazing fast performance.
That's the first of your problems.
> 100% it promotes amp pages.
When I go to Google News, there are no pages marked as AMP. In my original comment, I talked about AMP results in news searches on Google search, which do exist, just like in the Bing app. Those provide a better experience for me, and I suspect 99% of all users, than the AMP-less DDG results, which is why Google and Bing show them.
> I am not talking about bing "app". I don't know if such a thing exists.
https://blogs.bing.com/search/September-2016/bing-app-joins-...
You've demonstrated an even poorer understanding of AMP than the person I originally responded to.