News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CRISPR Can Now Edit Genes Using Nanoparticles Instead of ... by anvandare on Sunday November 19, 2017 @10:45AM (#15734320)
Not all genes have to have a function, or even a beneficial one. DNA could be riddled with legacy (inactive) code. As long as there's not enough evolutionary pressure -its negative value doesn't pass a threshold- the code would be retained.
Re:CRISPR Can Now Edit Genes Using Nanoparticles Instead of ... by stochastic_monk on Sunday November 19, 2017 @03:46PM (#15735847)
Consider an extremely high-dimensional feature space [not just genes, but transcripts/isoforms (differently diced-up versions of RNAs with different functions), hosts of active-but-not-transcribed-into-proteins RNAs, and dynamic regulation through interactions] which updates a reinforcement learning algorithm one epoch per generation (~20-30 years), and you'll see why it's far from optimized.
Re:CRISPR Can Now Edit Genes Using Nanoparticles Instead of ... by Dowwie on Sunday November 19, 2017 @02:41PM (#15735527)
I wonder what other dormant code exists that if toggled would trigger dramatic changes