Re:Kaspersky: Yes, we obtained NSA secrets. No, we didn’t he...
by SturgeonsLaw on Saturday November 18, 2017 @05:51PM
(#15731098)
When I engage with conspiracy communities it's usually to debunk extreme claims, so I approach most claims with skepticism, but wouldn't this:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/225
Suggest that it's not fabricated?
Re:Kaspersky: Yes, we obtained NSA secrets. No, we didn’t he...
by ajross on Saturday November 18, 2017 @06:05PM
(#15731167)
The claim of a quid-pro-quo is fabricated (seriously: it requires collusion between like five governments and three branches of the USG, of which Clinton had control of only one -- there is zero evidence of any of that). Obviously the conspiracy nuttery exists, so yeah, it's "out there".
Re:Kaspersky: Yes, we obtained NSA secrets. No, we didn’t he...
by orf on Saturday November 18, 2017 @06:07PM
(#15731175)
"It's out there" is the only bit of content. Anyone who reads that and says "well damn he clearly means watch out Hillary, they know about all your illegal doings. Shred everything!" rather than "fyi the right are spreading that nonsense talking point" is making a bit of a leap IMO.
I have to admit, even in a subthread where I was sure we'd see conspiracy nuttery, this is not the conspiracy I would have expected. You realize this is a totally fabricated thing, right? The timing alone should tell you all you need to know about what the intent behind it was.