Re:$3 Trillion in Forgotten Debt
by quickthrower2 on Friday November 17, 2017 @11:57PM
(#15727830)
When does this cross the line and become fraud?
Usually leases allow for overhead costs to be lumped in to some percentage.
If you buy something, you can roll installation services into it. This was just stretching it.
Re:$3 Trillion in Forgotten Debt
by jessaustin on Saturday November 18, 2017 @12:06AM
(#15727849)
Who would be the victim of fraud in the situation described above? It's my understanding that both the lessor and the lessee know about the office supplies.
Re:$3 Trillion in Forgotten Debt
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday November 18, 2017 @12:08AM
(#15727852)
And the IFRS rules in question came about to ensure investors were similarly informed. Leasing is less capital intensive, more tax efficient and more flexible than owning.
Case in point: when I consume a bottle of water from my Uber driver, I am consuming it as part of a lease.
When I used to sell stuff in college, my fortune 50 customers dumped all sorts of stuff into leases like office supplies, etc. My account had me running around buying thousands of pens from stores around us to for one Fortune 50 customer to roll into a lease for a bunch of servers.