Re:Update on Stock Options/RSUs Vesting Issue
by rhizome on Wednesday November 15, 2017 @12:49PM
(#15705804)
the cost to insure people in that 7% is substantially higher than the 49% receiving coverage through their employers. That's for a variety of factors including them being statistically unhealthier (unemployed people tend to be sicker)
From where do you draw the conclusion that the 7% individual market customers (if not 7% + 9% uninsured) are unemployed?
From where do you draw the conclusion that the 7% individual market customers (if not 7% + 9% uninsured) are unemployed?