News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elasticsearch 6.0.0 GA released by dakrone on Tuesday November 14, 2017 @04:47PM (#15699486)
We revisit the G1GC recommendation every once it a while. In fact, I am doing benchmarks and testing for G1GC versus CMS with Elasticsearch 6.0.0 right now, so that we have a better idea of where we stand.

Disclaimer: I'm an Elasticsearch dev employed by Elastic.

Re:Elasticsearch 6.0.0 GA released by lclarkmichalek on Tuesday November 14, 2017 @05:02PM (#15699611)
Cool, I've a pretty big cluster with some GC issues (p90 - 15s, p99 - 60s) during node failures, and would be super interested in those results! If there's anything a user can do to help, my email is on my user page :D
Re:Elasticsearch 6.0.0 GA released by notimetorelax on Tuesday November 14, 2017 @05:16PM (#15699714)
We observed in past that long GC is the cause of node failures. When long GC happens node doesn’t respond, master node decides that this node had left the cluster :\
Re:Elasticsearch 6.0.0 GA released by lclarkmichalek on Tuesday November 14, 2017 @05:49PM (#15699979)
Ya, we often see a node die of natural causes, and then the garbage produced from recovering the node and relocating the data ends up bringing down the rest of the cluster via long GC pauses.