Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M?
by LeifCarrotson on Monday November 13, 2017 @07:10AM
(#15685904)
I thought that what OP meant is that if you can only run the simulation for a relatively simple CPU at, say, 1 MHz, you can run and debug firmware for a 30 MHz CPU effectively, even if it's a little annoyingly slow - your 1-second init routine takes 30 seconds, but that's OK. If you have a 1 GHz CPU, whose more complicated architecture can only be simulated at 500 kHz, then a simulation is really tedious. A 20-second boot IRL of, say, Android takes half a day on your simulated processor.
That's not to say there's not someone coming in this morning to step through the overnight simulation they ran, but it's a lot easier to work with when your simulation runs nearer real time.
Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M?
by ChuckMcM on Monday November 13, 2017 @03:19PM
(#15689835)
For what its worth this captures it well. A processor design in the 30 - 50Mhz range can be usefully simulated on hardware on the engineer's desk (a workstation class PC).
That's not to say there's not someone coming in this morning to step through the overnight simulation they ran, but it's a lot easier to work with when your simulation runs nearer real time.