Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M?
by PinguTS on Monday November 13, 2017 @04:54AM
(#15685396)
It seems both of you haven't read the article itself. The new CPU design is not about high-end CPU you expect from Intel or AMD. It is about CPUs for the IoT. We are talking about Cortex-M alike CPUs you find in micro-controllers from Infineon, NXP, Renesas, and alike. BTW there is competition to the ARM design. It is the micro-controllers from NXP former Freescale, which have their own CPU design heavily used in automotive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
IITM will start with tapeout of microcontroller class(C-class) CPU. But IITM is designing mobile, server and HPC class CPUs.
Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M?
by gsmadhusudan on Monday November 13, 2017 @11:10PM
(#15692584)
I am not sure where we have indicated that the focus is only on IoT class cores. The E and C class are aimed at that segment and this segment probably will account for the vast majority of cores shipped. So they are the first ones to be shipped. The I class for example, an early version which is on-line will be a full OO core - quad issue - dual threaded.Server, HPC and vector based cores are equally important for us. The core road-map is clearly outlined on the codeline.
Re:An ARM killer from IIT-M?
by pedroaraujo on Monday November 13, 2017 @05:15AM
(#15685453)
The comment applies to both high-end CPUs and to microcontrollers as well. Power and performance are even more critical on a microcontroller than on an high-end CPU.
And yet you yourself said:
> The CPUs you mentioned were simple micro-controllers, they were not designed for heavy processing tasks, they don't even have a branch predictor which is something fundamental to have some significant performance.
So it seems his comparison was fair, after all? Given that the article is about microcontrollers too.