Re:Low-cost, non-invasive melanoma detector wins award
by hackerfromthefu on Sunday November 12, 2017 @03:55PM
(#15682584)
Sounds like a really good match for ML - as long as all the input the physician is detecting is visuals. There could be e.g. a smell or temperature component as well, but it's likely visual is enough to get very high accuracy eventually.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.