Re:Secret Service Agent Sentenced In Scheme Related To Silk ...
by jstanley on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:38AM
(#15669049)
It's not a bonus, it's theft. It's still theft even if you take it from a criminal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Secret Service Agent Sentenced In Scheme Related To Silk ...
by mysterypie on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:50AM
(#15669090)
Whoosh! A good example of why jokes are discouraged on HN.
Re:Secret Service Agent Sentenced In Scheme Related To Silk ...
by mosselman on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:44AM
(#15669065)
Swishhh
Re:Secret Service Agent Sentenced In Scheme Related To Silk ...
by SeckinJohn on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:48AM
(#15669078)
Then the government taking a criminal's drug money would also be theft?
Also, he took it from a government wallet, not directly from a criminal.
Edit: Just to clarify, I was just pointing out that the comment I replied to is tangential(1- he didn't steal from a criminal. 2- 'someone' can 'seize' a criminal's money without it being theft.).
He obviously stole -this isn't even a case of trying to steal; he stole, and got caught- and I don't get how he can get away with such a small punishment for stealing $10M+.
Re:Secret Service Agent Sentenced In Scheme Related To Silk ...
by StavrosK on Friday November 10, 2017 @05:54AM
(#15669104)
No. I mean, "theft" means "we made a law making it theft". By definition, government seizures are not theft.
Re:Secret Service Agent Sentenced In Scheme Related To Silk ...
by erasmuse on Friday November 10, 2017 @07:02AM
(#15669320)
I don't have a dog in this fight but surely neither the government nor anyone else gets to define what ordinary English words mean.
Re:Secret Service Agent Sentenced In Scheme Related To Silk ...
by alphydan on Friday November 10, 2017 @09:50AM
(#15670177)
Of course they do. What do you call: "Taking a person's life with your own hands?"
- For a white westerner: Crime, Murder, etc
- For the government/military: war, being a hero, etc
- For "brown" people in the wrong countries: Terrorism