News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by Retra on Thursday November 09, 2017 @09:09PM (#15667411)
One of my friends growing up had a child when he was a teenager, and he and I had a candid talk about this sort of thing once. I pointed out that he was close to his father, who would always tell him stories of all the 'legendary' and reckless mischief he made, and how he's somehow grown up to make the same kinds of mistakes, whereas I never knew my father, and thus didn't have any legendary tales to idolize, instead spending my time trying to figure out who I wanted to be on my own. And I basically said "when you go on to tell your child about all the fun you had causing mischief, make sure you understand that they're probably going to look up to you no matter what stories you tell them. Make sure you tell them ones worth hearing."

Off-topic, but this is one of the reason's I get irritated with this "child needs both parents" crap that people spout sometimes. A child needs as many good parents as they can find, and sometimes that number is 1.

Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by dsnuh on Thursday November 09, 2017 @09:33PM (#15667513)
Totally on point.

If you are an American, I challenge you to start noticing:

"Oh man, I was soooo shitfaced..."

"I was so hungover..."

"Dude, I don't even know how I made it home..."

"Nah, I'm fine to drive..."

"I'm sorry, it was the booze talking..."

"I need a fuckin' drink after this..."

"One for the road..."

"I don't give a shit, I need to piss..."

"Fuuuuuck it!"

Notice the advertising in convenience stores. The standees of scantily clad women holding a frosty bottle of beer. Usually near the Slurpee section. Or maybe they came and switched it out to a football playeror a jolly Santa made out of 12 packs. Tis the season!

America needs to wake up. I don't believe in prohibition of any drug, but I believe even in the current system it should be reclassified Schedule I.

Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by robotresearcher on Thursday November 09, 2017 @10:52PM (#15667818)
Schedule 1 drugs are prohibited. Heroin, MDMA, mescaline, GHB, etc.
Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by dsnuh on Friday November 10, 2017 @12:02AM (#15668058)
Correct.

"Schedule 1 (I) drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined by the federal government as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Schedule 1 (I) drugs are the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence."

Which part do you disagree with?

Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by robotresearcher on Friday November 10, 2017 @12:44PM (#15671525)
You said you don’t want to prohibit alcohol, but class it schedule 1. That’s a prohibition.

Ah, but reading more carefully you’d prefer to remove everything from the schedule. Now I see it’s not inconsistent. Took me a few reads to get there.

Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by dsnuh on Friday November 10, 2017 @12:56PM (#15671630)
Yeah, I could have worded that better.
Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by zeveb on Friday November 10, 2017 @09:46AM (#15670148)
Ethanol has several accepted medical uses.
Re:Cancer Doctors Cite Risks of Drinking Alcohol by dsnuh on Friday November 10, 2017 @03:52PM (#15672929)
I am not arguing against the molecule, just liquor.