Re:Russian Peasant Multiplication
by adrianratnapala on Thursday November 09, 2017 @06:57PM
(#15666813)
As it stands, this comment appeal to authority. What those authorities have to say might be right or wrong. But you give no hint even at what they are saying.
If you want to do a kind of literature review, where you cite these papers as a way of building some kind of actual thesis, that might be interesting. But what is the point of the above?
Re:Russian Peasant Multiplication
by romwell on Thursday November 09, 2017 @07:02PM
(#15666841)
The point of the above was a direct response to the parent, who asked for "mountains of evidence", which they didn't see for a simple reason of not bothering to check if they exist.
Re:Russian Peasant Multiplication
by chiaro on Thursday November 09, 2017 @08:03PM
(#15667140)
I'm not summarizing the literature just providing, as requested, some of the research that was directly referenced in the construction of the standards.
If you want to do a kind of literature review, where you cite these papers as a way of building some kind of actual thesis, that might be interesting. But what is the point of the above?