Re:Senators push to ditch social security numbers in light o...
by vel0city on Thursday November 09, 2017 @01:47PM
(#15664780)
All of those rules sound like the experiences I've had with US credit cards, at least recently. Statements have an area showing "If you only pay the minimum balance, it will take X years and end up totaling $Y." Almost all cards I have used have fraud protections built in, with many even having additional warranties for products purchased.
But it has different laws so that they're not as exploitative. The card companies accepted these laws in order to get a chance at the relatively wealthy British customer base. In particular:
* Issuers have to tell you each month how much it's going to cost in total to pay off your debt gradually, which is usually a scarily enormous figure. * Issuers own the risk of buying most things with the card. If you pay £200 for a hat from an online merchant with the card, and then the merchant goes out of business without delivering, the law says the Issuer bought that hat, you owe nothing. * Issuers own the risk of card fraud. Unfortunately juries and judges both tend to believe the smartly dressed bank official in a trial, but in law all the responsibility for fraud lies with the Issuer unless they can prove it's your fault.
A lot of people like me have a credit card, and then have the issuing bank also automatically pay off the balance every month from their current account. So the effect is that their credit card is a rolling 30 day interest free loan.