News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows Vista source code by cperciva on Sunday April 06, 2008 @06:55PM (#156471)
I am curious about why Windows would be "too expensive" to support.

Two reasons: 1. With system files, file locking, the registry, and similar complications, Windows makes backup software far more complicated than necessary -- in this case, "expensive" means "it would take a long time to write all the necessary code". 2. Windows users are generally less clueful, and therefore require more time-consuming hand-holding.

EDIT: There's also another benefit to starting with FreeBSD: Many FreeBSD users know and trust the project's security officer, while most Windows users haven't a clue who I am. :-)

Re:Windows Vista source code by revolvingcur on Sunday April 06, 2008 @07:09PM (#156477)
"2. Windows users are generally less clueful, and therefore require more time-consuming hand-holding."

And you earnestly believe that forcing them to use BSD would make them somehow better able to grok computing?

Re:Windows Vista source code by cperciva on Sunday April 06, 2008 @11:56PM (#156646)
Not at all. I'm not saying that I want my customers to use FreeBSD -- I'm saying that I don't want customers who use Windows.