Re:Show HN: How to ensure JavaScript code quality
by golergka on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @08:49AM
(#15643305)
Curious, how does this compare to a statically typed language compiler?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: How to ensure JavaScript code quality
by wschoi on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @09:03AM
(#15643394)
While DeepScan finds some type-related errors, it focuses on finding issues orthogonal to type checking.
For comparison with Java, DeepScan is like FindBugs.
Check the reply that I have wrote for shamas.
Re:Show HN: How to ensure JavaScript code quality
by yorwba on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @09:05AM
(#15643412)
Since the landing page mentions "semantic analysis" and based on the BAD_MIN_MAX_FUNC example in another comment, I think this is mostly focusing on logic errors that would pass a type checker/compiler without problem but show incorrect behavior at runtime. A similar product would be PVS-Studio https://www.viva64.com/en/pvs-studio/ (I haven't used it, but their articles occasionally get posted to HN.)