News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by B1narySunset on Monday November 06, 2017 @05:38PM (#15639628)
Do any interviewers notice resumes that are written in LaTeX compared to ones that aren't?
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by Xophmeister on Monday November 06, 2017 @06:25PM (#15639885)
Yep; it’s obviously not a deal breaker/winner, but we definitely notice. I once joked that we ought to mark up candidates with LaTeX CVs, but knock them slightly down if they stuck with Computer Modern :)
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by pvdebbe on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @02:14AM (#15641555)
Crap. I like Computer Modern. :(
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by lou1306 on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @08:13AM (#15643044)
It is not bad, and its history (as well as Metafont's) is remarkable.

However, the Adobe Utopia font, available by using the fourier package, is so much better IMHO.

Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by sjy on Monday November 06, 2017 @08:12PM (#15640364)
How can you tell that they used LaTeX if the CV is in PDF format, other than by guessing from the use of Computer Modern?
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by zaarn on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @04:53AM (#15642072)
After a while you can just spot it, LaTeX has a much higher quality typesetting and layout engine than Word or other WYSIWYG on-the-fly editors.

The easy way is usually to spot some of the no-no's of layouting; single words at the last line of a paragraph, sentences spanning over page breaks, spacing in block paragraphs, etc.

It's easiest with letters or invoices with some text, where the spacing and word placing is most obvious but you can usually tell in CVs with less text too.

Of course, sometimes Word gets lucky and does a proper layout, but I've found that it's rare that I get to see properly layouted word documents.

Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by blt on Monday November 06, 2017 @09:23PM (#15640621)
Quality of typesetting. Seriously.
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by blt on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @09:35PM (#15649550)
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by saadat on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @12:51AM (#15641307)
Look at the PDF's "PDF Producer", "Creator", or "Application" metadata fields in a PDF reader application.
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by jedberg on Monday November 06, 2017 @05:47PM (#15639672)
I definitely do. I automatically give plus points in my head even though I know I shouldn't.
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by tempay on Monday November 06, 2017 @08:12PM (#15640362)
Should you not?

I'm sure having a LaTeX CV correlates well with other skills which you might deem desirable and, if so, it seems like a perfectly reasonable indicator to use. It shouldn't be used exclusively, but nothing should be.

Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by LVB on Monday November 06, 2017 @06:19PM (#15639858)
I must say, I was happy to come across this after putting in the not insignificant effort of converting my resume into a nice looking LaTeX document: http://stevehanov.ca/blog/resume_comic.png
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by wyldfire on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @08:55AM (#15643334)
Yes, it's definitely a shibboleth. IMO it's a full duplex signal. When I notice that an interviewer noticed, it can make me more interested in an offer from that place if I think I'll be working with that/those interviewer/s.
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by pmiller2 on Monday November 06, 2017 @05:39PM (#15639638)
I would, probably, depending on the level of customization.
Re:Limecv – A LaTeX CV Document Class by Bromskloss on Monday November 06, 2017 @08:59PM (#15640524)
Of course. I mean, of course… https://xkcd.com/1301/