Re:Microsoft's reusable component framework for Yammer.com
by cjsuk on Monday November 06, 2017 @02:14PM
(#15638074)
I prefer pragmatist. I think we have the same goal really which is avoiding anything that is a commercial risk, money and time sink and that’s the status quo with this particular organisation even to this day.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft's reusable component framework for Yammer.com
by mseebach on Monday November 06, 2017 @06:00PM
(#15639735)
Ok, great. This isn't a commercial risk (MIT license) nor a money sink (free). So time sink remains, and whether it is a such should be reasonably quick to work out (give it a spin, see what happens).
No, I don't think we have the same goal, and you certainly do not come off very pragmatically.