News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:iPhone X Named 'Most Breakable iPhone Ever' by shawabawa3 on Monday November 06, 2017 @09:17AM (#15635559)
This is blatant advertising for some phone insurance company
Re:iPhone X Named 'Most Breakable iPhone Ever' by hungerstrike on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @11:40AM (#15644865)
It's also true. Ars Technica has now published a story saying the same thing - https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/11/youre-gonna-need-a-c...
Re:iPhone X Named 'Most Breakable iPhone Ever' by nathanaldensr on Monday November 06, 2017 @09:20AM (#15635578)
Agreed. That was my first thought also.
Re:iPhone X Named 'Most Breakable iPhone Ever' by mcgarnagle on Monday November 06, 2017 @09:34AM (#15635680)
First thoughts aside.

Why is the back of the iphone made of glass in the first place. At least before it was like a usb key... you know 50/50 chance of breaking. Now they're gone full lightning cable and made it a 100% chance that some glass would break.

Re:iPhone X Named 'Most Breakable iPhone Ever' by bearbearbear on Monday November 06, 2017 @11:48AM (#15636715)
The iPhone X is targeted at a demographic of people with a lot of disposable income.

The kind of people who, when their $1000 phone breaks, will simply go to the Apple store and buy another.

So think of it this way: If having a fully glass front increases sales of replacement parts and devices, then having both the front AND back glass will DOUBLE those repeat sales.

Apple is not a nonprofit, and they didn't become one of the wealthiest corporations on the planet by being generous and altruistic.

Re:iPhone X Named 'Most Breakable iPhone Ever' by jvzr on Monday November 06, 2017 @10:05AM (#15635925)
Qi charging capability requires a back that is almost radio transparent, or something along these lines, which aluminum is not
Re:iPhone X Named 'Most Breakable iPhone Ever' by pritambaral on Monday November 06, 2017 @12:34PM (#15637081)
Plenty of materials are both radio transparent and non-metallic.