Re:Funding Open Source: How Webpack Reached $400k+/year
by thejosh on Sunday November 05, 2017 @11:48AM
(#15630199)
Great it worked out for you, but if it wasn't such a pain to upgrade (I know this from personal experience), wouldn't there be lesser FUD?
Re:Funding Open Source: How Webpack Reached $400k+/year
by always_good on Sunday November 05, 2017 @12:47PM
(#15630561)
Is this your first time on HN? People will complain about anything and everything. They'll incessantly dismiss anything that they think they could have done better in a weekend.
There's this whole FUD around Javascript in general. If you didn't know better, you'd think there were client-side tools in other ecosystems where you didn't have to learn or credentialize in anything to build a full-featured client.
Re:Funding Open Source: How Webpack Reached $400k+/year
by linkmotif on Sunday November 05, 2017 @01:59PM
(#15630938)
I’m saying explicitly he or she is making up problems that don’t exist. My presumption is they never used webpack or tried for a second and gave up. My theory is this user likes to parrot things about the JS scene. Upgrading webpack involved changing some things from an array to a keyed object or something. It was nothing. I’m not particularly smart or JS savvy.
I guess people who leave comments like this have literally 0 threshold for any kind of error message and just want all the interfaces they ever use to be static and permanent. I’m not a webpack fanboy. I don’t like JavaScript. But I don’t go around posting nonsense FUD about “relentless changes” that don’t exist. Sorry buddy, you’re full of it.