Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20%
by ATsch on Friday November 03, 2017 @05:11PM
(#15622231)
Well, where is the disadvantage here? As far as I can tell, instant layoffs are bad because you without any income at short notice. If you have three months where you still receive pay to search for a new job, you have gained a lot of security.
Besides, I doubt Poland has arbitration clauses, so the workers would be free to sue. It would not be pleasant to stay in that job either way as you correctly pointed out though.
Re:Stack Overflow reducing headcount by 20%
by sklivvz1971 on Saturday November 04, 2017 @12:33PM
(#15625763)
The disadvantage is morale. It's much easier for the company to regain momentum if the chord is cut cleanly and swiftly.
That said, I'm not sure if it's true or effective, but having worked at Stack Overflow for years I'm pretty sure this was done to spare overall misery.
Most worker rights, in the end, become a matter of how much money they'll pay you to leave if they want you to leave.
Yes, one could--theoretically--fight back and not accept the money, but that only means you'd be a pariah in the company. What's the point of staying if the company wants you to leave and offers you a package? Take the money and get a new job in a couple weeks...