Re:DNAinfo and Gothamist Are Shutting Down
by look_lookatme on Thursday November 02, 2017 @06:54PM
(#15615096)
DNAinfo was never profitable in its 8 year existence. With the union taking root it was probably never going to see a return.
In my opinion the only unethical thing here was taking down the archives. Total severance seemed fine.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:DNAinfo and Gothamist Are Shutting Down
by berberous on Thursday November 02, 2017 @08:13PM
(#15615597)
What about Gothamist? I would bet it was profitable since it was run independently for a long time. It was a glorified blog — lots of reprinting Post articles rather than the independent reporting that DNA Info did, so I imagine it had much lower costs.
This tweet by someone who appears to have written for Gothamist claims that "Gothamist actually WAS profitable. DNAInfo wasn't."
Re:DNAinfo and Gothamist Are Shutting Down
by katedye on Thursday November 02, 2017 @09:24PM
(#15616004)
They could have sold to a company that would have overhauled their monetization, but you're right that it isn't _unethical_ to shut-down (unnecessary, maybe).
Re:DNAinfo and Gothamist Are Shutting Down
by notyourday on Friday November 03, 2017 @11:28AM
(#15619891)
Opex loses is liability. Company with no opex is an asset.