News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:House Republicans propose to scrap $7,500 electric vehicl... by olympus on Thursday November 02, 2017 @02:20PM (#15612866)
Plus there's the environmental impact of strip-mining lithium for the batteries. This impacts hybrids as well as EVs.

Owning a Tesla (the current fad) or Prius (the previous fad) has long been about looking like you are environmentally conscious rather than actually being environmentally conscious. True lovers of mother nature ride the bus, train, or ride a bike.

Re:House Republicans propose to scrap $7,500 electric vehicl... by slowmovintarget on Thursday November 02, 2017 @05:18PM (#15614373)
Owning a Prius was about feeling good.

Owning a Tesla, from what I can tell, is about operating a truly excellent vehicle that happens to be electric.

Re:House Republicans propose to scrap $7,500 electric vehicl... by olympus on Thursday November 02, 2017 @09:40PM (#15616076)
The Mercedes-Benz S-class is a better car than the Model S in many ways (not all). A lot of people could afford either but buy the Model S because it is electric, not just that it happens to be electric.

Just a quick thought from someone that actually went shopping and drove both: The MB S-class beats the Model S in terms of luxury feel. Hands down. The Model S is faster. And quieter. But it does not feel as good as a MB at all. Before you ask, no, I ended up buying neither. I bought a Subaru Forester and an airplane for the same money.

Re:House Republicans propose to scrap $7,500 electric vehicl... by dreamcompiler on Friday November 03, 2017 @04:08AM (#15617443)
The carbon footprint of mining and refining oil for gasoline certainly dwarfs that of lithium mining. Partially because there are a lot more ICE cars than EVs now, but also because gasoline is needed repeatedly over the lifetime of the car, while lithium is mined only once per car.