Re:The two questions I ask every interviewer
by dragonwriter on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @04:16PM
(#15605062)
> Presuming this is a technical interview and the skills are already identified and qualified the "what it is" isn't particularly important.
It may not be important to the person asking the question, but it's actually quite central to being able to have a coherent answer.
A better question, if the “what” isn't important, is to identify a concrete thing rather than a “revolutionary idea”; if “what?” isn't important, don't ask a question which fundamentally requires having an answer to “what?”.
> Attempting to bullshit past the spirit of the question
Asking a poorly framed question and blaming the person questioned for bullshitting for not correctly deducing the intended spirit certainly reflects negatively on someone, just not the interviewee.
Attempting to bullshit past the spirit of the question with deflections and non-answers are easily identifiable failures.