Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ...
by kop316 on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @10:26AM
(#15601391)
Chiming in to agree about Ars. I was really disappointed to see how there was no fact checking when the Voynich Manuscript "decoding" came out (granted they did publish an article retracting it, but even a cursory amount of fact checking could have told you that theory held no water), I simply don't trust any articles they publish outside of their core tech competency (and seeing articles like this hurt even my trust on that). I would like to see an alternative, but the only thing I really read for tech news past them is here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ...
by agumonkey on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @10:28AM
(#15601402)
The voynich issue was a black spot. But somehow they tried to evolve bigger and got far from what they were. It was a very simple website before but the articles and people around were high grade. Now it's big thing with less quality all around.
Market dynamics I suppose.
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ...
by away2017throw on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @11:04AM
(#15601771)
The last thing to do is adding a bunch of pro-SJW topics and you got another Verge/Vox/Polygon.
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ...
by DarronWyke on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @11:40AM
(#15602280)
They already did that when they went anti-GG and started taking cues from people like Brianna Wu. That was the start of the decline for them.
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ...
by anon11012017 on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @12:14PM
(#15602689)
Anti-GG is a good thing in my book.
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ...
by cyberpunk0 on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @01:42PM
(#15603651)
How so?