News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after new report. Parent comment

Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ... by Numberwang on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @10:06AM (#15601197)
Do you have alternative sources you would recommend instead of Ars? I quite like ars but if there are better publications out there I'd love to know.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ... by DarronWyke on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @10:30AM (#15601431)
Not found anything worthwhile really. Slashdot is still decent. Of course HN. User-run sites tend to be better. But I stopped reading Ars and The Register a while ago due to slippages in journalistic quality and various other hit pieces.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ... by guitarbill on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @11:19AM (#15602007)
To be fair, The Register is good at UK/Oz/storage news, as well as puns - if those don't interest you, it's probably not worth reading. Also not sure what level of "journalistic quality" you're expecting from El Reg? Or any news outlet for that matter.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ... by DarronWyke on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @11:37AM (#15602247)
How about writing and publishing actual facts rather than hit pieces? I've seen El Reg push out several articles about non-UK things that were patently wrong -- and that their userbase ripped them for. No apology, no retraction, no update.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ... by digi_owl on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @10:40AM (#15601520)
anandtech.com may be worth a look.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD, which lost over $2.8B in 5 years, takes a hit after ... by ionised on Wednesday November 01, 2017 @12:21PM (#15602766)
That has been going downhill since Anand left.
[ Parent | on HN ]