At the time I was happy when she said she would send the newsletter emails for me, but now I see she just wanted people to think she was the public face for WakaTime to further a tech founder persona. Yea I made a mistake letting her send newsletters on behalf of WakaTime, but that doesn't mean she can claim to have built WakaTime.
> This response is fishy as hell.
I didn't raise a fuss when I should have because I didn't want to cause her trouble, but then she demanded a large sum of money from me in exchange for giving me WakaTime... when she never owned WakaTime. That's what I consider fishey.
I am still unsatisfied with your version of events because it seems to discount that Priyanka did any work at all.
Her last blog post was on: 2015-03-31
This doesn't look like an sophisticated engagement.
https://i.imgur.com/VHeJPYY.png
That first spike is December 2014. Interesting timing!
The last Slack notification email I have from her is from 10/26/2015. Why is it so hard to believe that she did a year or so's worth of work for WakaTime? Why are her contributions to be valued less because they aren't code?
Also read: https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=15617309&goto=item%3Fi...
She's very good at making people believe her lies.
Here's one example of an email from Priyanka on behalf of WakaTime:
https://i.imgur.com/PYHuc8s.png
And the removal of her blog posts:
https://github.com/wakatime/wakatime-blog/commit/5d671e9aab6...
Edit:
And an interesting Twitter thread:
https://twitter.com/downey/status/861908826223759360
This makes me want to stop paying for WakaTime.