News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The concept of schizophrenia is dying by mattmanser on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @04:53AM (#15591799)
I hate seeing utter lies like this in any debate. It's propaganda and I react strongly to it. Claiming 50% of teenagers smoking weed, let alone lsd, will have problems is an utter, out-right lie.

I was never into drugs like friends, if that's what you're insinuating. I tried a few, but beer was my drug of choice, and nicotine for a while.

There are polls where something like 40-50% of UK teenagers (and probably US) had tried weed.

If this guy were even vaguely right we'd see an epidemic of metal health problems right now.

Re:The concept of schizophrenia is dying by mercer on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @05:42AM (#15591959)
I don't disagree with you concerning OP's claims, so I'm mostly on your side, but I don't see how you're helping by 1) frothing at the mouth at a point of view that, however wrong it may be, is very common, and 2) making an equally unbalanced claim of the opposite based on anecdata.

There's plenty of evidence that pot smoking can at the very least exacerbate problems, which strikes me as blindingly obvious when it comes to any substance that has mood altering effects as strong as weed, and I have just as much anecdata to support that view.

That said, I guess I can understand the frustration. I don't know where you live and what the status of weed is, but as a Dutch person I do realize that I don't (often) have to deal with the 'weed is evil' argument, and consequently it's easier for me to not get too upset about it.

Re:The concept of schizophrenia is dying by gkya on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @05:15AM (#15591869)
Yeah whatever you don't like is evil fearmongering. And they don't even say trying it will drive you nuts.
Re:The concept of schizophrenia is dying by ionised on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @10:30AM (#15593473)
Quoting obviously nonsense statistics in this case seems like fear-mongering to me.
Re:The concept of schizophrenia is dying by gkya on Tuesday October 31, 2017 @12:20PM (#15594384)
There is a reference to a study on the topic elsewhere on the thread, and in the article itself, if I'm not mistaken. Also AFAIK it's not required to be a medical doctor to talk about these issues here, and not everyone has a list of publications on every topic they discuss. If you think a view is wrong then answer it, but name-calling and accusations only undermine any such discussion. It's not like the opposer is citing the literature too.