Re:The Scientific Case for P≠NP
by SomeStupidPoint on Sunday October 29, 2017 @05:58PM
(#15581669)
....Duh?
But it's absolutely insane to take the impossibility of low-constant, low-degree embedding as evidence as a general lack, given the rich structure of "large" numbers.
But it's absolutely insane to take the impossibility of low-constant, low-degree embedding as evidence as a general lack, given the rich structure of "large" numbers.
Which is what it's being used as in this post.