No, it shows Twitter partnering with a media organisation. I'm willing to bet Twitter offered similar deals to many other media outlets, both US and abroad.

Twitter does nothing to promote biased reporting in this, merely that RT should use their platform for political reporting.

I agree hence the reason I put 'colluding' in quotes.

This is grasping at straws.

Multiple parties can collude with Russia. The fact that Twitter was and Trump extensively uses Twitter for his own propaganda might underline that fact.

> Trump extensively uses Twitter for his own propaganda might underline that fact.

Him and how many other hundreds of millions of other users, using Twitter for its primary purpose.

If 'Twitter sold ads to Russia and <candidate> used Twitter to promote their own propaganda' is the baseline for collusion with Russia to influence the election then that would make every single presidential candidate guilty of collusion also.

Only one candidate colluded with Russia though.