Re:How Australia's $49B internet network came to be ridiculed
by Gatsky on Thursday October 26, 2017 @10:39PM
(#15565265)
Yeah, LTE capacity can definitely not meet everyone's needs. But in my part of an Australian major city, the only wired option at the moment is NBN over HFC, with a set up fee or a long contract, at a time when all the retailers are trying to undercut each other by buying insufficient capacity.
Under these conditions, LTE is the clear winner. That may change as you point out.
Re:How Australia's $49B internet network came to be ridiculed
by jimjimjim on Friday October 27, 2017 @04:32AM
(#15566631)
yep. 4g relies on most other people doing little more than messaging, looking at facebook and checking maps to see where the nearest noodle place is.
once everyone is pushing video levels of data around then it will be miserable.
Re:How Australia's $49B internet network came to be ridiculed
by vacri on Thursday October 26, 2017 @10:25PM
(#15565189)
> wired is dedicated.
Cable internet is shared. Most of the NBN rollout (HFC) is on ageing cable internet puchased from another vendor.
Re:How Australia's $49B internet network came to be ridiculed
by jbarham on Friday October 27, 2017 @01:44AM
(#15565987)
> Wireless bandwidth is inherently shared between everyone, wired is dedicated.
False. NBN FTTP connections use GPON which is a shared connection (https://www.nbnco.com.au/utility/glossary-of-terms.html#g).
If everyone does that you'll be lucky to stream youtube videos at 240p. Wireless bandwidth is inherently shared between everyone, wired is dedicated.