Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit

Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit by travmatt on Thursday October 26, 2017 @02:16PM (#15561527)

>Who is a self-proclaimed neo-Nazi in the white house?

Seb Gorka

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit by Danihan on Thursday October 26, 2017 @02:19PM (#15561551)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/19/donald-trump-aide...

>Mr Gorka denied any anti-Semitism in his family.

>He said his father had protected Jewish boys wearing yellow stars on the way to school as a child. When Communists took power, he supplied information to MI6 before being arrested, tortured and imprisoned (possibly betrayed by Kim Philby). He arrived in the UK after escaping during the 1956 uprising.

How exactly is that "self-proclaimed" when he is denying it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit by travmatt on Thursday October 26, 2017 @02:38PM (#15561715)

On one hand he says that he isn’t a part of the order, on the other hand he wore their insignia to the inaugural ball. Maybe he was using neo nazi symbolism ironically?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit by Danihan on Thursday October 26, 2017 @02:43PM (#15561761)

>Leslie Waters, prof of European History at Randolph-Macon College, said: “It definitely is a symbol that a lot of Hungarians would associate with racist ideology and anti-Semitism but plenty of Hungarians also associate it with some sort of generic patriotism and anti-communism.”

Or he wore it to reflect his family history and as an anti-communist symbol....

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit by orwin on Thursday October 26, 2017 @03:21PM (#15562132)

I agree with you in your comment that point that these disguised insults against trump are inappropriate here (saying this more directly could have better effect imo). But please, you seems to be a good guy, do not fall into the Tribal trap, whether it is "i must defend m own even if i'm wrong" or "He has opinions from the opposite side, he must be wrong on everything else". The people this man hang out with AND this symbol he wore are enough evidences that he support, even if it is a little, Nazi ideology.

Since nowaday, nazi ideology has several sides, xenophobic, antisemitic, racist ant anti-feminist (i might forgot some), he might agree on at least one, and if you're dead set on defending him you can say he is only xenophobic or something, and the other part of neonazism, he doesn't support, but are you really believing that he wore this to say "i'm anti-communist"? If he did, he must have been seriously misinformed (and anyone this out of touch, honestly, deserve to be kicked of of any job that require you to understand history).

Please do not go tribal on Hn.

[ Parent | on HN ]