>Yet the "dossier" that was paid for via a quid pro quo arrangement is not of concern? IMHO both are very concerning.

Paid to an american firm by both the GOP and Dem campaigns. That is not the same as a quid pro quo with the intelligence service of a foreign government that is actively trying to interfere in an election

>So you consider RT publishing stories about the Flint Water Crisis to be highly detrimental to the orderly nature of American society? ...

That came totally out of no where. I'll let you argue that with your self all you want.