Why scientists are redefining the kilogram

Re:Why scientists are redefining the kilogram by dpark on Thursday October 26, 2017 @10:54AM (#15559339)

Any such discussion is entirely in the realm of not science. Non-observable means not falsifiable means not science. Saying the non-observable universe is going faster than the speed of light is like saying God’s beard is orange.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why scientists are redefining the kilogram by agentgt on Thursday October 26, 2017 @09:48PM (#15564978)

Ok briefly observable but not anymore and never will be. And galaxies can move faster than the speed of light: https://m.phys.org/news/2015-10-galaxies-faster.html

I was going to correct that technicality on observable but was on mobile earlier.

Also you can absolutely have a theory that explains the observable universe reliably (i.e. Verifiable) but at the same time makes suggestions about the unobservable universe (for example most cosmos theories say the actual universe is bigger than the observable). We just don't have the technology or time to observe it yet.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why scientists are redefining the kilogram by dpark on Friday October 27, 2017 @04:54PM (#15572140)

Your link clarifies the statement. Space is expanding. Galaxies aren't actually moving FTL.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why scientists are redefining the kilogram by agentgt on Friday October 27, 2017 @11:57PM (#15573920)

Yes I meant we can't see or go there because it's expanding / moving faster than we can get there (light).... I'm still not sure if I'm completely wrong or just misunderstood (given the downvote).

[ Parent | on HN ]